Damien Hirst Retrospective at Tate Modern in London

Damien Hirst: 'The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living' of 1991 installation view; © Damien Hirst courtesy Tate Modern

 

Tate Modern features the first museum retrospective of YBA-frontman Damien Hirst in UK. We take this occasion to investigate the phenomenon Damien Hirst.

 

 

Damien Hirst as an Artist

 

 

 

We think, from a purely aesthetic point of view, Mr. Hirst most importantly can take credit that he took minimal art further, from very formal questions, deeply into existential human issues, such as life and death.

 

 

We still really like these pieces:

  • ‘A Thousand Years’ of 1990,
  • ‘The Acquired Inability to Escape’ of 1991
  • ‘In and Out of Love’ of 1991, or
  • ‘Far from the Flock’ of 1994

 

These are some of the best works of this time and the effect of seeing these works together in one exhibition is striking. Though one is prepared for a perfect mise-en-scene and impeccable effects, the works still functions spot on. Hirst’s art is deadly serious in guise of the contemporary cultural.

 

 

Spin painting by (c) Damien Hirst courtesy of Tate Modern

 

 

 

Damien Hirst however, seems to have become a victim of his own tremendous economic success: We think he was not able to fulfill the enormous demand for ever more works with pieces, that matched the artistic quality of these early works.

 

In 2005 Damien Hirst was asked in an interview by Mirta D’Argenzio for the catalogue of his 2005 retrospective in Naples, Italy, how he would consider his ‘spin paintings’:

 

 

‘I don’t know. I think they are probably the weakest aspect of my work. I love it when the machine is turning, but as soon as they are dry and stop I get bored very quickly of them. If I had one on my wall I would turn it. (...) What do you think of them? Shit!’

 

 

There is nothing to add. We also don’t like the spot paintings: They are primarily an artsy status symbol with a decorative quality, but we cannot see a real theoretic foundation for the necessity of these works.

 

And we don’t think that a parallel show of all spot paintings (1986 – 2011) in all global branches of Gagosian Gallery and the media coverage of critics traveling to see all these shows do make them even better paintings.

 

 

 

As reaction to a personal crisis in 2007, Mr. Hirst gave up drinking and re-started classic oil painting by himself. In fall 2009, he showed his first entirely self-painted show at the Wallace Collection in London. Critically, it was a disaster - however his dealers managed to sell some of these canvasses for 7 digit numbers.

 

Tate Modern curators pay tribute to this point of view as, they made a rigid selection in favour of aesthetic criteria and completely left out Hirst’s recent self-made paintings.

 

(c) Damien Hirst courtesy by Tate Modern

 

Damien Hirst as Successful Business Man

 

In general, if you want to make money from selling things, you can either sell few items for very high prices, or you can sell many items for lower prices. Damien Hirst does it all: He sells on one end his tanks and sculptures for 8 digit numbers and on the other end lots of merchandising (from mass editions of skulls to t-shirts) starting from a few bucks.

 

His economic masterpiece was 'Beautiful inside my Head Forever': In 2008, Damien Hirst successfully sold off his entire stock in a famous Sotheby's auction. Ironically, the auction took place at the same day, when Lehman Investment Bank filed for bankruptcy. This day marked the end of the first art market boom in this Millennium.

 

 

London outlet of Other Criteria (c) PAS

 

With ‘Other Criteria’ Damien Hirst created his own retail chain selling his mass-editions and art related merchandise. From an art historic point of view most of the items sold there are at least rather questionable. But from a business point of view it is very reasonable to meet a demand that exists.

 

As what concerns Hirst’s latest project as entrepreneur, his buying up of a row of five warehouses just across the Tames from Tate Britain to build a large gallery and to have office space, chances are high that this will be a success. From 2014 onwards, Hirst is going to show his collection as well as own works there and the two shops and the restaurant will do the rest.

 

Finally, we would like to emphasize that there is much criticism about the quality of Damien Hirst’s work, much of it with reason. On the other hand, Hr. Hirst can claim that he created some of the best known art images (shark in a tank, diamond skull, …) world-wide.

 

Who else can say that?

 

 

by

Julia Loeschl & UGL

 

 

Damien Hirst at Tate Modern, London, UK

Trough 9th September 2012

 

 

 

Comments

Amar, 19-07-12 18:52
Needed to send you one very little obarovstien to help give many thanks over again with your spectacular techniques you've provided here. It is simply unbelievably open-handed of people like you to supply openly just what a number of us could have offered for sale for an electronic book to help make some cash for themselves, notably considering the fact that you might well have done it in the event you wanted. The techniques likewise acted as a great way to be aware that other people have a similar zeal like mine to grasp significantly more on the subject of this issue. I am certain there are many more pleasant situations ahead for people who browse through your blog.
Lautaro, 03-09-13 00:26
It's my opinion that a foeculoserrs can have a major effect on the applicant's life. Real estate foeculoserrs can have a Seven to 10 years negative effects on a client's credit report. Any borrower who has applied for a home loan or almost any loans even, knows that the worse credit rating will be, the more challenging it is to have a decent financial loan. In addition, it could possibly affect any borrower's ability to find a quality place to let or hire, if that will become the alternative housing solution. Good blog post.
Elena, 03-09-13 11:51
Fantastic web site. A lot of helpful <a href="http://dkohkiy.com">inirfmatoon</a> here. I am sending it to several friends ans also sharing in delicious. And of course, thank you to your sweat!
Dayane, 05-09-13 11:55
A formidable share, I <a href="http://iockwjjqncw.com">siplmy</a> given this onto a colleague who was doing slightly analysis on this. And he in fact purchased me breakfast as a result of I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! However yeah Thnkx for spending the time to debate this, I really feel strongly about it and love reading extra on this topic. If potential, as you grow to be experience, would you thoughts updating your weblog with extra details? It's highly helpful for me. Massive thumb up for this weblog submit!
Marissa, 09-09-13 00:18
That band is pretty awful and unorgiinal, I expected something a little more exciting from the Shark in formaldehyde dude. Guess those days are over for him withh his new bedazzler and spin art styles. Where's my etch a sketch. http://zjwjnprab.com [url=http://yhtoqzircx.com]yhtoqzircx[/url] [link=http://uszykpcjjpi.com]uszykpcjjpi[/link]
Titia, 26-09-13 12:52
Posted on While openness and dialogue are important, once again the misrepresentation of the validity of animal models &#8216;standing in&#8217; for human patients will remain front and centre. In other words, the scientists will continue to promote the need for animal research when we know that the data from animal experimentation can never be truly applied to the human system. Many scientists have declared this and I would advise anyone reading this post or celebrating the Basel Declaration to do their own homework: chiefly, read what many scientists and doctors concur about regarding animal-based human medicine &#8211; that animal research is dangerous to human health.1000 Doctors Against Vivisection is available through Amazon.com http://www.theindustryofcool.com/online-college-degrees.html http://www.twinklehillfarm.com/online-car-insurance.html http://www.transformbaltimore.net/baltimore-car-insurance.html
Wilhelmina, 07-10-13 11:11
The watermark is not on the purchased work. Yes these are quite common arguments which I have heard often in regards to artists selling their work and to be honest it generally comes from artists with salaries in other jobs. So in other words artists who don&#39;t have the same pressures on them to find income to pay rent, bills and to find food. All your points are true about commodification and most are aware of it yet choose to support the artist financially anyway because they wish them to continue creating. Juniper can be seen on youtube as well.. so why bother to purchase the same thing from Sedition? people do so because they feel a connection to the artist and wish to support them. Artists live in an almost obsolete lifestyle now which doesn&#39;t fit with modern society. They need to be creative to make ends meet. Societies romantic notion of the artist is the artists greatest foe. The best way for you to understand the other side Vanessa is to quit your job and see how long you can survive as a full time artist. And I don&#39;t mean for a month or two.. but for ten years constantly creating new concepts and ideas without going stale, all the while having no guaranteed income. Try that then see how you feel about sites like Sedition. What if income from Sedition allows me to pay for six months more tier for Immersiva? is that not beneficial? Or should I stick to ideologies and close the sim all the while feeling proud of my stance on commodification? It is not always so easily distinguishable what is good and bad beyond the initial reaction. And in regards to &quot;When Art becomes Content for sale it becomes a commodity and loses at least some of it&#39;s spiritual nature.&quot; So yesterday Juniper was full of spiritualism yet today after being on Sedition it lost something? Your comments actually fit into Marshall McLuhans &quot;The medium is the message&quot; concept whereby you are judging the work from where you find it. I think if that is the case with you then you are not looking at the artworks themselves. You shouldn&#39;t use a broad brush to compartmentalize thousands upon thousands of works without properly observing them, simply because you perceive them as a commodity based on their origin. If an artist is intentionally creating for a market, almost assembly line, thus losing that spiritualism you speak of then yes that sucks. But you have eyes.. you look at the work, you can&#39;t just assume that. You can see on your own without having to decide preemptively that a work has lost something simply because there is a $ beside it. If you can only distinguish assembly line art from real artwork by whether it is commodified then you are not looking at the actual work in front of you but letting other factors cloud your vision.Furthermore, if you are a professor as I am interpreting, then you should be preparing your students for the harsh realities that await them outside the comfortable confines of student life and student loans. The greatest complaint artists have for their professors is often how little they were prepared for real life, and while ideologies are nice they need to be mixed with realities which I hope you are also offering them.I can&#39;t tell if my response seems harsh, but I don&#39;t intend it to be overly so. Hopefully it creates a alternate perspective. http://carquotesoptions.com/ http://getcheapcarquotes.com/
Bobbo, 08-10-13 10:54
Down the road from me there is a cafe. They sell coffee made with dishwater and sandwiches made with stale bread stuffed full of grass instead of salad. You might think they would have no customers, but their business is in fact booming.You see, they use this clever marketing tactic where they subtlety imply that if your tongue can&#8217;t appreciate the taste of their food, and if your stomach can&#8217;t find nutritional value in their food, then it&#8217;s because of a deficiency in YOU and not their rancid food.All they needed to do was bribe a few food critics to write some pseudo intellectual reviews of their cafe. They weren&#8217;t even particularly positive reviews. The crucial thing was that all the reviews discussed the cafe as if it really was a valid eating establishment serving valid food (plus throw in some stuff about the cafe being progressive, challenging and &#8216;edgy&#8217;). And now no one is willing to admit that they can&#8217;t find taste and nutritional content in the cafe&#8217;s dishwater coffee and lawn clipping salads. Not the food critics. Not the customers either.The same thing has happened in the &#8216;arts community&#8217; and as a result no one is willing to admit that just putting a dead shark in a tank and giving it a pretentious title is not something that any self respecting grown up artist should feel they can get away with (assuming they want to be taken seriously that is). Sure if you&#8217;re some teenage art student going through a &#8216;rebellious&#8217; stage, we might forgive you but not if you&#8217;re trying to pass yourself as a grown up serious artist.When you break it down, this clever marketing trick switches the emphasis from the artist being required to justify his/ her work and create art full of meaning&#8230;.. to the public being required to prove their own capacity to appreciate art by finding (or at least pretend to find) layers and layers of &#8216;meaning&#8217; i43e0n whatever is shoved in front of their faces, be it a dead shark or some coloured spots or whatever.And so, if you call a dead shark in a tank &#8220;a pile of crap&#8221; it can no longer be an honest and justified criticism of a (con) artist, it is now more like an admission of failure on YOUR part. It&#8217;s like saying &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry but I just don&#8217;t have the required imagination or artistic sensibility to &#8216;see&#8217; this work and decipher its layers of meaning. I must be so shallow and uncultured because, to me, it just looks like a dead shark in a tank.&#8221;To echo another commenter here, I think a good litmus test is this: can you imagine it for yourself? I cannot imagine Mahler&#8217;s 5th for myself. I cannot imagine a Picasso for myself, or a Stubbs or even a Rothko. I don&#8217;t particularly care for the Beatles, but I can&#8217;t imagine Revolver for myself.However, I *can* imagine a dead shark in a tank for myself. And I can think about death for myself too. I do not need Hirst&#8217;s help. And his contribution adds nothing to what my own imagination and intellect can conjure up while waiting for the number 73 bus. Therefore from my perspective Hirst adds nothing of value to the world. His &#8216;art&#8217; just takes up valuable space in galleries.It&#8217;s a sad fact that &#8216;culture&#8217; has been so sucked dry of genuine art that it&#8217;s as if we&#8217;ve compensated by all agreeing to call everything and anything art. We now turn any old load of nonsense into art just by endlessly discussing it as if it were indeed art. But even as babies we soon learn that distinguishing food from poop is what defines us as &#8216;higher beings&#8217; above the level of vermin or amoeba.And (contrary to the current consensus, it seems) a cultured person is NOT someone who finds layers and layers of &#8216;meaning&#8217; in every pile of pretentious garbage assembled and cynically chucked in an &#8216;art gallery&#8217;. A cultured person is actually the opposite: someone who is able to recognise that which has no meaning, no significance, no worth and no beauty&#8230;.. reject it &#8230;. and then move swiftly on.To embrace everything all the time is to end up like that toddler in the park playing with dog poops.Hirst is depressing proof that, for now at least, http://www.encounterberlin.com/rent-a-car-in-berlin.html http://www.getautoinsur.net/ http://www.getaccreditedonlinedegrees.net/
Cthutq, 21-10-13 23:30
Dear Naif,Thank you for your email. It really is a very saeicpl lamp. Please go to the shop at and look under Lighting and you can buy it there and we will get it delivered straight to you. Thank you for your interest and support. Best Wishes. The Insider Chic Team. http://ofntxflio.com [url=http://xofodegib.com]xofodegib[/url] [link=http://nwsyrdvwa.com]nwsyrdvwa[/link]

Add comment

* - required field

*


CAPTCHA image for SPAM prevention
If you can't read the word, click here.
*
*